MFT with 20MP), better low light performance, more dynamic range, handy 96MP High Resolution mode (only useful for static scenes), modern L mount, and improved EVF and LCD. You get a larger full-frame sensor with 24MP (vs. With all that, I’ve briefly tested my S5 with the 12-60mm kit lens.Īs others have said it really feels like a full-frame version of the GH5. Just something about the ergonomics, the image, the UI and the build that makes it the best for me when it comes to video compared to Sony, Nikon and Canon. Plus, I prefer the video on the Panasonic bodies. However, with the aforementioned High Resolution 96MP mode my hope was I could get what I needed with the S5 without forking out the big bucks for the R5. At $3,899 USD it’s very expensive (the S5 with kit lens is $2,299 by comparison). The Canon EOS R5 flagship full-frame is also on my radar. A hybrid in every sense of the word! (such was my sales pitch to Loni Stark). But without a sacrifice in quality for either. In theory that would mean I could use the S5 for both stills and video. And as a bonus I could use the S5 to replace my GH5 for video. That could allow me to capture Loni’s artwork in, let’s say, a master original, perfect for archiving. So the “High Resolution” mode on the S5, which captures a 96MP photo using I guess what might be called some computational photography jujitsu - essentially sensor shifting eight copies of an image - has me interested. We need high quality stills with lots of detail and as much resolution as possible so that we can blow them up as needed for posters and showings and so forth. Here I do need to pixel peep - a first for me. However, the reason why a full-frame body holds appeal for me is the ability to take very high resolution photos of Loni Stark’s artwork.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |